📸 Créditos da imagem: Rokas Tenys/Shutterstock
Background
For years, U. S. administrations have requested Elon Musk’s SpaceX to enable or disable Starlink terminals in various regions, influencing military and civilian communications.
Requests during the Biden Administration
- Disabling service to prevent Iranian-backed militias in Yemen and Lebanon from using Starlink.
- Activating service to provide internet access inside Iran during protests.
- Expanding Starlink for Ukrainian forces after Russia’s invasion.
These actions were coordinated through Pentagon and White House officials, with the government sharing intelligence about militia use of diverted terminals.
Requests during the Trump Administration
- Proposed delivery and activation of Starlink terminals in Iran following U. S.-Israel attacks.
- Intended to strengthen internet connectivity for anti-government demonstrators.
While the U. S. government reportedly shipped thousands of terminals, no public confirmation of activation exists.
Impact on Ukraine
President Zelenskiy noted that Starshield, the military version of Starlink, had been intentionally throttled, affecting drone operations and missile defense.
SpaceX stated that any speed limits are set by U. S. military and the president.
Questions About Musk’s Role
Experts question whether Musk’s decisions are purely business or influenced by U. S. policy, given his control over a national security asset.
European officials call for independent satellite communication capabilities to reduce reliance on SpaceX.
As the situation evolves, the balance between commercial interests and national security remains a focal point.
📰 Leia a notícia completa em: Olhar Digital »